Saturday, November 14, 2009

Where I Am Now

I do most of my commenting and posting these days on Twitter and Facebook. Find me there at

www.twitter.com/gerryconway

or

www.facebook.com/gerryconway

Wednesday, July 15, 2009

Olympians

My daughter is a big fan of these books, and she's gonna go crazy for this:



Thursday, May 14, 2009

Saturday, May 09, 2009

David After Dentist

Emmanuel Kant couldn't have put it better.

Monday, April 13, 2009

Add me to the list

of millions of people who apparently love this video.


Tuesday, March 31, 2009

Hit and Run

'Bout sums it up from my point of view.


Saturday, March 21, 2009

What's in the Box?

Wow, is this cool or what? Nice work for an amateur film.

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

I Am So In Geek Heaven Right Now


You may have heard, our new President is a collector of Spider-Man and Conan the Barbarian comics. If you do the math (uh, let's see, he's 47, and most kids reach their peak interest in comics around age 12, which leads me to suspect he read Spider-Man thirty-five years ago, which would have been 1973, which means... OMG, he knows I killed Gwen Stacy!) you'll realize the Spider-Man stories he read were probably those written by yours truly, and the Conan comics he collects are most likely those scribed by my buddy Roy Thomas.

Which makes this Onion article all the funnier for me, particularly the reference to Conan the Destroyer.

Yippee!

Friday, January 23, 2009

Baby Store Fail

Thoughts on "Lost"

I was reading a discussion thread about the new season of "Lost" over on Boing-Boing, and had to jump in to give my own two cents' worth. Thought I'd pass along here what I said there:

***

I'd like to bring some professional insight to the discussion, since most of the criticism of "Lost" in this thread seems to grow from the premise that "the writers are just making it up as they go along."

To establish my bona fides, I'm a writer, and I wrote episodic television for almost twenty years, and produced some too. So I'd like to think I speak with some authority here -- if not about the specific situation the "Lost" producers find themselves in, then in general terms, the specific situation *any* television producers find themselves in, creating a TV show week-to-week.

Point one -- the writers *absolutely* knew where they wanted to go with the show, from the day they first pitched the concept.

Point two -- where they wanted to go *absolutely* changed over the course of developing the story and the series week to week and year to year.

This is because creating a television show is more than just writing words on paper and having them translated magically into film. It's an organic, living process that is influenced by forces that are inevitably beyond your control -- and ultimately is the better for it. Let me give you one small example from personal experience.

A few years ago I was writing and producing a show about a pair of detectives. I created a love interest for one of the detectives, and developed a year-long arc for the relationship. We cast the part of the lover; the actors had chemistry; we did a three-part introductory story; and then the actor we'd cast as the lover LEFT THE SHOW because he wanted to be free during pilot season. (Pilot season is when networks and producers make life hell for casting agents of ongoing series; all the good actors refuse to commit because they want to be available for casting in their own pilots.)

As a result, we had to drop the long-planned romance in mid-story line, to the considerable detriment of the series. Should we have locked up the actor before we began the arc? Probably; but we were laboring under certain economic constraints, and we thought we had an understanding with the actor's agent. Sure, we knew they'd probably f**k us if they got a better offer, but we figured they'd at least wait till they got the better offer before f**king us. (Happily, the actor in question never got cast in a pilot, and because of the reputation he developed from this and similar diva behavior, he hasn't been cast in any other ongoing series since. Good riddance.)

Anyway, point is, the writers of "Lost" are constrained by simple reality as they develop their series. Actors cast for minor roles suddenly take off and are lost to the show; actors who you think will bring something special to a plot line turn out to fall flat, and have to be cut; other actors who are cast as minor figures suddenly play so well you start writing more and more material for them; and so on. (This is probably why Ben has become so important -- a potentially minor character is played brilliantly by an actor, and the writers are inspired to develop more material for him. This isn't to say the writers would not have created a similar character to serve the story as Ben now does; it's just to say it might not have been Ben.)

In addition to the impact performers have on the writing process, you also have to take into account the impact the network executives have -- both positive, when they're supportive of what you're trying to achieve, and negative, when they actively seek to undermine your efforts. (I believe most of what went wrong with "Heroes" in year two was a result of network interference.) The creators of "Lost" probably had a clear vision from the start of where they want to take the show, but I'm betting they had to struggle through most of the first three years to get the network brass to let them tell the story their way. That's why Season One consists mostly of single-episode "flashback" anthology-style stories, focusing on character backstory: it's something network execs could understand and relate to. It's also why "Season Two" began to get more complex, as the network suits allowed the writers to play around with their overall concept and begin to lay the groundwork for the end game. And it's most certainly why "Season Three" went down the rabbit hole for the first six weeks, because the writers were forced to create an artificial six-week self-contained story line simply to address the network's desire to have two blocks of shows, one in the fall season, and another beginning in late January.

The point is, whatever problems the show may exhibit from time to time, in terms of inconsistencies and inelegant transitions or reveals. most likely has more to do with practical issues of production than with any overall lack of a planned outcome. One can argue that it's the job of show runners to deal with the practicalities in such a way that it appears as if they intended to go the way they have all along, and you'd be right. In that sense, I think "Lost" is a brilliant series of adaptations to the realities of producing a weekly television series. The producers know where they want to go, but the path they have to take to get there is constantly changing.

By the way, that's how it is for every writer, except the most disciplined and sterile hack. You know where you want to go, and you move in that direction, but sometimes as you follow the path, the destination changes, and either you adapt, or your story dies.

Viva "Lost."

Monday, January 19, 2009

Thanks for the Memories


As the final hours tick down toward the conclusion of what might be judged from the long view of history as the worst Presidency since James Buchanan dithered us into the Civil War, let's take a moment to remember the good times. And by good times I mean these.

Saturday, January 17, 2009

Waiting for Tuesday

Tonight the family and I were talking about the excitement we're feeling in anticipation of Tuesday's Inauguration. I told Rachel, who's just turned thirteen, that she's lucky to be at an age where she can appreciate an event that is surely one of the most important moments in American history. Whatever you may think about our President-elect, whether you were a supporter of his before the election, you'll have to admit -- we're about to witness a true turning point, a once-in-a-lifetime event. My mother was eleven years old when FDR became president in 1933, and his time in office coincided with her coming of age, and her young adulthood. I was eight when John F. Kennedy was sworn in, too young to remember much of the day, but old enough to be impressed by my parents' awareness that his inauguration was something special -- both for their generation, and for them personally as Irish-American Catholics. On a less positive and uplifting note, I recall vividly what I was doing the day Kennedy was assassinated (I was eleven years old, attending school, and the nuns who were our teachers reacted with shock and grief when the news came over the school loudspeaker). I remember the morning I read that Nixon was resigning his office, a front-page article in the New York Times. I was twenty-two years old, and I'd cast my first vote for President less than two years earlier, for George McGovern. The feeling of elation that surged through me at the news of Nixon's decision to step down was mixed with a sense of weary relief and despair; relief that his reign of paranoia and hate was over, and despair that it had ever occurred in the first place. Even more emotionally confusing are my memories of Ronald Reagan's election, another historic moment for our country. I voted for Reagan, a fact I've had varying feelings about both at the time and since. A lifelong Democrat, I'd felt betrayed by what the Democratic party had become: it was, after all, the Democrats who got us into Vietnam (an arguable position, I admit, but one I wasn't alone in believing); it was the Democrats who'd mismanaged the economy; it was the Democrats who'd decreased America's standing in the world (with the considerable help of Richard Nixon -- but the Democrats ran two out of three branches of government, and couldn't escape responsibility for the state the country found itself in by the late 1970s); it was the Democrats who'd given us an out-of-control, overly-regulated state, with an open-ended and destructive commitment to lifetime welfare. Ronald Reagan, whatever one might think of him today, offered fresh ideas and a forward-looking, dramatic shift in American policy, forcing a reappraisal of the contract between the governed and the government. Each of these historical moments -- elections, an assassination, and a resignation -- were distinctive because they were clearly more than just a moment, they were turning points in history, and even the most historically-tone deaf of us knew this to be true at the time.

But this Tuesday, those of us who are fortunate enough to be alive at this moment, find ourselves present at a once-in-a-generation event.

This Inauguration Day will be remembered for as long as our nation exists, for so many many reasons, most of which are obvious to anyone reading this, and don't need to be repeated by me.

And we're going to be part of it, witnesses to history.

What can I say but... awesome.

What a gift to us all.

Thursday, January 08, 2009

Belated Christmas Wishes

Just saw this, and thought I'd pass it along. These machima videos can sometimes be surprisingly good, given the limits of the resources the creators are working with...